Looking at it closer, don't we have a chicken and egg issue here?
One can argue, a problematic (and "rich") area will lead to more lawyers practicing in that area because there are more money to be made?
Looking at the idea of this "theorem" from a totally different angle.
Any scientific area that has more scientists studying it will lead to more problems to be found/solved.
Or should it go the other way around?
A challenging field of scientific study will lead to more scientists working in the field.
Hmmm, my memory is not that great but I think I just did a "train-noise vs farmers' field" and "dentists drill noise vs. ??" transformation analogy here. Something I remember reading from Prof. Cheung.
1 comment:
Interesting "theorem".
任何行业律师愈多，其权利界定愈有问题。称之为张氏定律吧。"
Looking at it closer, don't we have a chicken and egg issue here?
One can argue, a problematic (and "rich") area will lead to more lawyers practicing in that area because there are more money to be made?
Looking at the idea of this "theorem" from a totally different angle.
Any scientific area that has more scientists studying it will lead to more problems to be found/solved.
Or should it go the other way around?
A challenging field of scientific study will lead to more scientists working in the field.
Hmmm, my memory is not that great but I think I just did a "train-noise vs farmers' field" and "dentists drill noise vs. ??" transformation analogy here. Something I remember reading from Prof. Cheung.
Post a Comment